Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-08-23

PARICHHAN MISTRY (DEAD) BYLRS. & ANR. vs ACHHIABAR MISTRY AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71127
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PARICHHAN MISTRY (DEAD) BYLRS. & ANR.
Respondent
ACHHIABAR MISTRY AND ORS.
Author
PATTANAIK
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the right of redemption under a usufructuary mortgage can only be extinguished through lawful means, such as a contract, court decree, or statutory provision. The Court found that the High Court erred in concluding that the mortgagor's right to redeem was extinguished merely due to non-payment of rent, as this does not constitute a lawful extinguishment of the right. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Patna High Court was set aside, reinstating the mortgagor's right to redeem the property.

PARICHHAN MISTRY (DEAD) BYLRS. & ANR. vs ACHHIABAR MISTRY AND ORS. · Niyam