Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1996

Supreme Court of India · 1996-04-12

RT.B.P. SUGANDHAR BISHOP IN MEDAK vs D.DOROTHY DAYASHEELA EBENEZER

Citation / case number
SC 1996/2486
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RT.B.P. SUGANDHAR BISHOP IN MEDAK
Respondent
D.DOROTHY DAYASHEELA EBENEZER
Author
NANAVATI
Bench
NANAVATI G.T.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court erred in quashing the suspension of Respondent No.1 and the constitution of the Enquiry Commission by the Diocesan Executive Committee. The Court found that the terms of reference were not vague and that the allegations against Respondent No.1 warranted an enquiry. The Court reinstated the authority of the Executive Committee to conduct the enquiry and upheld the suspension order, emphasizing the need for proper administrative procedures in such cases.

RT.B.P. SUGANDHAR BISHOP IN MEDAK vs D.DOROTHY DAYASHEELA EBENEZER · Niyam