MADHUKAR BAKRU PINGAL vs SHRI RAJENDRA D. GAIKWAD & ORS.

The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal's decision to set aside the appellant's appointment as Police Patil was erroneous, as it prescribed an arbitrary allocation of marks (50% for viva-voce) contrary to established legal principles. The Court directed that a new selection process be conducted with a revised allocation of 85% for written examination and 15% for viva-voce, ensuring all candidates are considered. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal's order was set aside, maintaining the appellant's interim service until a proper selection is made.