Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-11-13

M/S. PACKRAFT (INDIA) PVT.LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTER V.S. MAN vs U.P.F.C. THROUGH ITS M.D.R.M. SETHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1995/64137
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. PACKRAFT (INDIA) PVT.LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTER V.S. MAN
Respondent
U.P.F.C. THROUGH ITS M.D.R.M. SETHI & ORS.
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the guidelines established in Mahesh Chandra v. UPFC [(1993) 2 SCC 279] regarding the sale of properties by financial corporations are binding under Article 141. However, the Court clarified that any infraction of these guidelines should be addressed through judicial review rather than contempt proceedings. Consequently, the petitioner's request for contempt proceedings against the respondents was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies instead.

M/S. PACKRAFT (INDIA) PVT.LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTER V.S. MAN vs U.P.F.C. THROUGH ITS M.D.R.M. SETHI & ORS. · Niyam