Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-11-03

GAUHATI UNIVERSITY vs SH. NIHARLAL BHATTACHARGEE

Citation / case number
SC 1995/12621
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
Respondent
SH. NIHARLAL BHATTACHARGEE
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant-University was not duly served with summons as required under Order 5 Rule 6 and Order 9 Rule 6 CPC, leading to an ex-parte decree. The Court clarified that limitation under Article 123 of the Limitation Act, 1963 begins only when the defendant has knowledge of the decree, not from the date of the decree itself. The Court set aside the lower courts' orders, allowing the application to be filed within the stipulated time after knowledge of the decree.

GAUHATI UNIVERSITY vs SH. NIHARLAL BHATTACHARGEE · Niyam