Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-11-08

PATEL CHANDULAL TRIKAMIAL & ORS. vs 1. RAORI PRABHAT HARJI2. RABARI MALJI RAIMAL (DEAD) BY LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63332
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PATEL CHANDULAL TRIKAMIAL & ORS.
Respondent
1. RAORI PRABHAT HARJI2. RABARI MALJI RAIMAL (DEAD) BY LRS.
Author
MANOHAR SUJATA V.
Bench
MANOHAR SUJATA V.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the term in the rent note prohibiting encroachment on adjacent land constitutes a valid term of tenancy under Section 12(1) and Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The Court found that the tenants' encroachment on the landlord's adjacent land constituted a breach of the tenancy terms, thus upholding the decrees against the tenants. The High Court's ruling that the term was not a condition of tenancy was overturned, affirming the landlord's rights.

PATEL CHANDULAL TRIKAMIAL & ORS. vs 1. RAORI PRABHAT HARJI2. RABARI MALJI RAIMAL (DEAD) BY LRS. · Niyam