SABIR HUSSAIN & ANR. vs STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the omission to specify the number of services in the approved scheme under Section 68C and Section 68D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 does not invalidate the scheme. This decision is consistent with the precedent set in Ramesh Chand v. State of U.P., where similar issues were addressed. The Court held that procedural omissions do not affect the validity of the approved scheme.