Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-03-07

SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCEMARKETING COMMITTEE, D.K.DI vs VARADARAYA SHENOY AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1993/202585
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCEMARKETING COMMITTEE, D.K.DI
Respondent
VARADARAYA SHENOY AND ANR.
Author
A.S. ANAND
Bench
A.S. ANAND

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the competence of the Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee to file a complaint under the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966. The Court held that the Secretary, as defined under Section 2(39) of the Act, is authorized to act on behalf of the marketing committee, which is a body corporate under Section 9. The Court concluded that the Secretary has the requisite authority to file complaints, thereby affirming the validity of actions taken under the Act.

SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCEMARKETING COMMITTEE, D.K.DI vs VARADARAYA SHENOY AND ANR. · Niyam