Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-07-26

ASPINWALL & CO., KULSHEKAR, MANGALORE vs LALITHA PADUGADY & ORS. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/70002
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ASPINWALL & CO., KULSHEKAR, MANGALORE
Respondent
LALITHA PADUGADY & ORS. ETC.
Author
M.M. PUNCHHI
Bench
M.M. PUNCHHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the computation of gratuity for workmen employed in a seasonal establishment under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court held that the workmen were entitled to gratuity calculated at the rate of 7 days' wages for each of the two seasons in a calendar year, as the establishment's operations were split into two distinct seasons despite being continuous in nature. The Court affirmed the decisions of the Controlling Authority and the High Court, thereby upholding the claims of the workmen under Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

ASPINWALL & CO., KULSHEKAR, MANGALORE vs LALITHA PADUGADY & ORS. ETC. · Niyam