MR. R.D. HATTANGADI vs M/S PEST CONTROL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS

The Supreme Court held that negligence in causing damage is actionable under tort law, affirming that both drivers were liable due to their rash conduct leading to the accident. The Court emphasized the need to assess damages separately into pecuniary and non-pecuniary categories, with the former being quantifiable expenses and the latter encompassing pain, suffering, and loss of amenities. The Court upheld the principle that compensation assessments involve some degree of estimation, guided by objective standards. The High Court's reduction of compensation was addressed, leading to a re-evaluation of the award.