Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-02-06

STATE OF M.P. vs RAM KISHNA BALOTHIA

Citation / case number
SC 1994/72564
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF M.P.
Respondent
RAM KISHNA BALOTHIA
Author
MANOHAR SUJATA V.
Bench
MANOHAR SUJATA V.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, which denies the right to apply for anticipatory bail, is unconstitutional as it violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized that the right to seek anticipatory bail is a fundamental right and cannot be arbitrarily denied. Consequently, the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court declaring Section 18 unconstitutional was upheld.

STATE OF M.P. vs RAM KISHNA BALOTHIA · Niyam