Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-12-05

HARBILAS RAI BANSAL vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1995/64141
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARBILAS RAI BANSAL
Respondent
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
Author
Kuldip Singh
Bench
KULDIP SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutional validity of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1956, which restricted landlords from evicting tenants from non-residential buildings for personal use. The Court held that the amendment was valid and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing the state's interest in regulating rent and tenant rights. The appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was therefore dismissed, upholding the amendment's provisions.

HARBILAS RAI BANSAL vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. · Niyam