STATE OF U.P. vs RAVINDRA NATH CHATURVEDI

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the penalty imposed on the respondents due to lack of reasonable opportunity during the inquiry. The Court emphasized the necessity of examining an officer acquainted with the records and allowing the respondents to cross-examine witnesses or present rebuttal evidence. The Court directed the Inquiry Officer to complete the inquiry within four months, or appoint a new officer if the current one is not in service, thereby allowing the appeal with specific timelines for compliance.