Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1995

Supreme Court of India · 1995-08-28

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECY. vs RANGILA RAM

Citation / case number
SC 1988/69806
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECY.
Respondent
RANGILA RAM
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to amend a decree under Sections 151 and 152 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) to award additional benefits under the Amendment Act 68 of 1984 after an award has become final. The Court reaffirmed its previous rulings in State of Maharashtra vs. Maharau Sravan Hetkar and Union of India v. Pratap Kaur, establishing that once a civil court's award is final, it cannot be altered or corrected for additional benefits. Consequently, the decree of the High Court was annulled, and the appeal was allowed.

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECY. vs RANGILA RAM · Niyam