Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1994

Supreme Court of India · 1994-10-18

STATE OF U.P. vs U.P. GOVERNMENT COUNSEL (CRL.) WELFARE ASSOCIATION

Citation / case number
SC 1991/80381
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
U.P. GOVERNMENT COUNSEL (CRL.) WELFARE ASSOCIATION
Author
K. RAMASWAMY
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Uttar Pradesh Government Litigation (Engagement of Counsel) Ordinance, 1991, stating that the law officers appointed by the Government are not employees but provide professional services. The Court affirmed that the Government has the authority to regulate the engagement of counsel based on trust and confidence, and thus, the High Court's stay on the Ordinance was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, and the interim suspension of the Division Bench's order was made final without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Ordinance.

STATE OF U.P. vs U.P. GOVERNMENT COUNSEL (CRL.) WELFARE ASSOCIATION · Niyam