Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1994

Supreme Court of India · 1994-05-12

H.R. ADYANTHAN vs SANDOZ (INDIA) LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1983/64793
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.R. ADYANTHAN
Respondent
SANDOZ (INDIA) LTD.
Author
KULDIP SINGH
Bench
KULDIP SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court identified a conflict between multiple three-Judge Bench decisions regarding the interpretation of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, particularly concerning the status of medical and sales representatives before the enactment of the Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976, and the subsequent amendment in 1984. The Court determined that the matter requires clarification and thus referred it to a larger five-Judge Bench for resolution. This referral underscores the importance of consistent interpretation of statutory definitions in labor law.

H.R. ADYANTHAN vs SANDOZ (INDIA) LTD. · Niyam