Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1994

Supreme Court of India · 1994-12-13

SUBHASH AGGARWAL AGENCIES vs BHILWARA SYNTHETICS AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1994/77635
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBHASH AGGARWAL AGENCIES
Respondent
BHILWARA SYNTHETICS AND OTHERS
Author
S. MOHAN
Bench
S. MOHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the requirement for a reasoned award is essential under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the appellate tribunal must provide reasons for its decisions. The Court found that the High Court erred in setting aside the appellate tribunal's order on the grounds of lack of reasoning, emphasizing that the principle of merger does not apply when a reasoned award exists. The Court reinstated the appellate tribunal's decision, affirming the validity of the original reasoned award made by the sole arbitrator.

SUBHASH AGGARWAL AGENCIES vs BHILWARA SYNTHETICS AND OTHERS · Niyam