Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1994

Supreme Court of India · 1994-12-16

NARAINDAS LILARAM ADNANI vs NARSINGDAS NARAINDAS ADNANI & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1994/77574
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NARAINDAS LILARAM ADNANI
Respondent
NARSINGDAS NARAINDAS ADNANI & ORS.
Author
MANOHAR SUJATA V.
Bench
MANOHAR SUJATA V.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of substitution of legal representatives under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, noting that the Will of the deceased appellant had not been probated as per Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act. The Court held that while the executor of the Will could not be impleaded due to the lack of probate, the legal representatives were already on record, allowing for the transposition of the 9th respondent as the appellant. The judgment clarified the procedural aspects of arbitration and the implications of the unprobated Will on the legal standing of the parties involved.

NARAINDAS LILARAM ADNANI vs NARSINGDAS NARAINDAS ADNANI & ORS. · Niyam