STATE BANK OF INDIA vs AJIT JAIN .

The Supreme Court addressed the execution of a decree under Order XXI Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to mandatory legal provisions during auction sales. The Court held that the sale was void due to violations of these provisions, thus allowing the objections raised by the appellant and the judgment-debtor. The outcome was a remand to the Trial Court for a proper adjudication of the objections, ensuring that all parties were afforded the opportunity to present evidence.