Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1993

Supreme Court of India · 1993-03-31

SMT. PARKASH KAUR vs SMT. SANDHOORAN

Citation / case number
SC 1979/62209
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. PARKASH KAUR
Respondent
SMT. SANDHOORAN
Author
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA
Bench
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the withdrawal of an application under Order XXI Rule 90 C.P.C. is a unilateral act by the judgment debtor, which does not require court permission. The Court clarified that the application under Order XXI Rule 89 C.P.C. was deemed to have been made on 25.9.1974, when the requisite deposit was made, thus falling within the prescribed period of limitation. The High Court's view that the application was time-barred was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.

SMT. PARKASH KAUR vs SMT. SANDHOORAN · Niyam