RSDV FINANCE vs VALLABH GLASS WORKS

The Supreme Court held that the Bombay High Court erred in dismissing the suit based on jurisdictional objections related to the endorsement 'Subject to Anand jurisdiction' on the deposit receipt. The Court clarified that under Section 21(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, objections regarding the place of suing must be raised at the earliest opportunity, and since there was no failure of justice, the suit should not have been dismissed. The Court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing that the cause of action arose in Bombay and the jurisdiction of the High Court was valid.