Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1993

Supreme Court of India · 1993-02-04

MAJOR GENL. B.M. BHATRACHARJEE (RETD.) ANDANOTHER vs RUSSEL ESTATE CORPORATION AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1992/87154
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAJOR GENL. B.M. BHATRACHARJEE (RETD.) ANDANOTHER
Respondent
RUSSEL ESTATE CORPORATION AND ANR.
Author
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY
Bench
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court found the respondents guilty of contempt for violating its order dated 1.8.1991, which prohibited any further allotment of flats. The Court clarified that 'allotment' includes delivery of possession and registration of sale deeds, not merely the signing of agreements. The respondents' claim that the flats were allotted prior to the order was rejected, as they failed to seek clarification on the order's meaning, thus constituting gross contempt. The Court imposed punishment for this breach under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

MAJOR GENL. B.M. BHATRACHARJEE (RETD.) ANDANOTHER vs RUSSEL ESTATE CORPORATION AND ANR. · Niyam