Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1992

Supreme Court of India · 1992-11-02

KISHAN SINGH vs STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1993/78013
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KISHAN SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.
Author
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA,K. RAMASWAMY AND N. VENKATACHALA]
Bench
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA,K. RAMASWAMY AND N. VENKATACHALA,JJ.]

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of a criminal appeal for default due to the absence of the appellant or his counsel is improper under Section 384 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that the appellate court must examine the merits of the case before dismissing an appeal. The Court emphasized that unlike civil appeals, criminal appeals cannot be dismissed for non-prosecution, and the High Court should have restored the appeal. The Court set aside the High Court's orders and allowed the appeal, reinforcing the duty of the appellate court to consider the appeal on its merits regardless of the parties' presence.

KISHAN SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. · Niyam