Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1992

Supreme Court of India · 1992-11-04

STATE OF M.P. vs HARIDATT SHARMA

Citation / case number
SC 1992/82892
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF M.P.
Respondent
HARIDATT SHARMA
Author
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA,S. MOHAN AND N. VENKATACHALA]
Bench
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA,S. MOHAN AND N. VENKATACHALA,JJ.]

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the respondent, initially appointed as Superintendent in a Deaf Mute and Blind School, is entitled to continue in service until the age of 60 based on the Explanation to the retirement rules, which was partially struck down as ultra vires. The Court clarified that the respondent's prior teaching experience qualifies him for the extended retirement age despite his later non-teaching role. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing the respondent to remain in service until 60 years of age, reversing the appellant's order for retirement at 58.

STATE OF M.P. vs HARIDATT SHARMA · Niyam