Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1991

Supreme Court of India · 1991-07-31

M.B. SANGHI, ADVOCATE vs HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71162
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.B. SANGHI, ADVOCATE
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ORS.
Author
A.M. AHMADI
Bench
A.M. AHMADI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding of contempt against the appellant under Section 2(c)(i) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for making disparaging remarks about a Sub-Judge, which were deemed to undermine public confidence in the judiciary. The Court emphasized that the appellant's apology was insincere, as he had a history of contemptuous language towards judges. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and the need for ethical standards in the legal profession.

M.B. SANGHI, ADVOCATE vs HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ORS. · Niyam