Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1991

Supreme Court of India · 1991-02-14

M/S.GOKAK PATEL VOKART LIMITED vs DUNDAYYA G.HIREMATH

Citation / case number
SC 1991/76252
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S.GOKAK PATEL VOKART LIMITED
Respondent
DUNDAYYA G.HIREMATH
Author
K.N. SAIKIA
Bench
K.N. SAIKIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the offence under Section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 is a continuing offence, allowing for prosecution beyond the six-month limitation period post-retirement of employees. The Court emphasized that 'officer' or 'employee' includes both past and present individuals, and that the nature of the offence keeps the contravention alive day by day. The Court reversed the High Court's decision, allowing the appellant's complaints to proceed, thereby affirming the legislative intent to facilitate the retrieval of company property.

M/S.GOKAK PATEL VOKART LIMITED vs DUNDAYYA G.HIREMATH · Niyam