Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1991

Supreme Court of India · 1991-08-23

RANJIT SINGH SARPANCH vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
SC 1980/61372
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANJIT SINGH SARPANCH
Respondent
THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH
Author
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA
Bench
JAGDISH SARAN VERMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that under Section 427(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a life sentence must be treated as imprisonment for the remainder of the convict's natural life unless commuted or remitted. The Court held that a subsequent life sentence cannot run consecutively to an earlier life sentence, as a person has only one life span. Therefore, any remission or commutation granted for the earlier sentence does not affect the subsequent sentence, which remains in effect unless similarly addressed.

RANJIT SINGH SARPANCH vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH · Niyam