Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1991

Supreme Court of India · 1991-04-16

GENERAL SECRETARY ROURKELA SRAMIK SANGH vs ROURKELA MAZDOOR SABHA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1991/80315
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GENERAL SECRETARY ROURKELA SRAMIK SANGH
Respondent
ROURKELA MAZDOOR SABHA AND ORS.
Author
P.B. SAWANT
Bench
P.B. SAWANT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the term 'Implementation Machinery' under Section 11 of the Code of Discipline includes both Implementation Units in Labour Departments and Tripartite Implementation Committees, which function independently. The Court found that the appellant union correctly approached the Labour Commissioner, who is the designated Implementation Officer, for recognition. The High Court's conclusion that the Labour Commissioner was not part of the 'Implementation Machinery' was incorrect, leading to the appeal being allowed and directions for expeditious recognition proceedings.

GENERAL SECRETARY ROURKELA SRAMIK SANGH vs ROURKELA MAZDOOR SABHA AND ORS. · Niyam