Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-10-09

CHANDER BHAN vs HOTILAL GUPTA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1982/63885
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHANDER BHAN
Respondent
HOTILAL GUPTA AND OTHERS
Author
M.H. KANIA
Bench
M.H. KANIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that promotions within the Court of Small Causes must be made by the Judge of the Small Causes Court, as per Rule VI(1) of the High Court Rules, and that the rule of rotation does not apply to such appointments. The Court clarified that the specific mention of the Judge in the rules indicates that the powers of promotion are conferred solely on that officer. The Court found that applying the principle of rotation was unreasonable in the context of the Small Causes Court, where only one Upper Division Clerk exists, distinguishing it from the District & Sessions Court where multiple posts are available.

CHANDER BHAN vs HOTILAL GUPTA AND OTHERS · Niyam