Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-07-13

KRISHENA KUMAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69675
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRISHENA KUMAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Author
MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (),RAY, B.C. ,KANIA, M.H.,SAIKIA, K.N. ,AGRAWAL, S.C.
Bench
MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (CJ),RAY, B.C. ,KANIA, M.H.,SAIKIA, K.N. ,AGRAWAL, S.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the notifications issued by the Railways providing options to certain Provident Fund retirees to switch to the Pension Scheme were not discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court distinguished the case from D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, asserting that the cut-off dates had a rational nexus with the objectives of the notifications. The petitioners' claims for equal treatment were dismissed, affirming that the doctrine of precedent does not bind the Court to broader propositions not essential to the original decision.

KRISHENA KUMAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. · Niyam