Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-01-15

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. vs R.V. RAYANIM ETC. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1988/70683
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC.
Respondent
R.V. RAYANIM ETC. ETC.
Author
SABYASACHI () MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI (CJ) MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, specifically Sections 14, 17, 30, and 33, a court can only review an arbitrator's award for errors apparent on the face of the record or if the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction. The Court clarified that in the absence of a speaking award, it cannot speculate on the arbitrator's reasoning. The Court dismissed the special leave petition, affirming that the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction in considering escalation of costs, as it was not discernible from the award itself that any error occurred.

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. vs R.V. RAYANIM ETC. ETC. · Niyam