Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-01-31

SURESH CHAND vs GULAM CHISTI

Citation / case number
SC 1983/66079
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SURESH CHAND
Respondent
GULAM CHISTI
Author
A.M. AHMADI
Bench
A.M. AHMADI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, specifically Sections 2(2), 39, and 40, a tenant must deposit all arrears of rent and costs within one month of the Act's commencement to benefit from its provisions. The Court clarified that the benefit of Sections 39 and 40 applies only to suits, appeals, or revisions pending as of July 15, 1972, and that the tenant's deposit made after the ten-year exemption period does not suffice. The appeal was allowed, reversing the lower courts' decisions that had denied the landlord's eviction request.

SURESH CHAND vs GULAM CHISTI · Niyam