Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-02-13

SMT. VIDHYA DHARI BHAGAT vs ALLAHABAD LAW JOURNAL CO. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1989/72374
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. VIDHYA DHARI BHAGAT
Respondent
ALLAHABAD LAW JOURNAL CO. LTD.
Author
K. SHETTY
Bench
K.J. SHETTY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 19(2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, a tenant can seek re-entry into premises only if the eviction was executed under specific sections, including Section 14(1)(e). The Court clarified that since the tenant's possession was delivered based on a compromise in a separate suit under Section 14(1)(a), the tenant's application for re-entry was not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, overturning the Rent Control Tribunal's directive to restore possession to the tenant.

SMT. VIDHYA DHARI BHAGAT vs ALLAHABAD LAW JOURNAL CO. LTD. · Niyam