Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1990

Supreme Court of India · 1990-02-28

SMT. YAMUNA MALO0 vs ANAND SWARUP

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63232
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. YAMUNA MALO0
Respondent
ANAND SWARUP
Author
MISRA RANGNATH
Bench
MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, a tenant must raise objections to the validity of a limited tenancy before the lease lapses. The Court clarified that the Rent Controller erred in entertaining the tenant's objection after the tenancy had expired, emphasizing that such objections should be made during the tenancy period. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's dismissal of the second appeal, thereby reinforcing the legislative intent behind Section 21 to facilitate limited tenancies without prolonged disputes.

SMT. YAMUNA MALO0 vs ANAND SWARUP · Niyam