KISHORE CHAND vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 IPC beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the need for a conclusive chain of circumstantial evidence. The Court reiterated that if any circumstances are consistent with the accused's innocence, he is entitled to the benefit of doubt. The conviction was overturned, and the appellant was acquitted, highlighting the importance of fair trial rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India.