SMT. MAYAWANTI vs SMT. KAUSHALYA DEVI

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that there was no valid and enforceable contract between the parties, as evidenced by Exhibit PW II/A. The Court emphasized that for specific performance under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, the terms of the contract must be clear and the parties must have a mutual agreement. The appeal for specific performance was dismissed, and the appellant was awarded only the refund of the earnest money of Rs. 5,000.