FIRM GANPAT RAM RAJKUMAR vs KALU RAM & ORS.

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner firm failed to comply with the court's order to deliver vacant possession of the property, which was obtained under the assurance of possession. The court emphasized that the actions of the partners' relatives to file a suit for injunction were an attempt to frustrate the court's order, thus constituting contempt. The court directed the Senior Sub Judge to ensure compliance with the eviction order, allowing police assistance if necessary, and mandated immediate reporting of compliance.