Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-10-04

HMM LIMITED & ANR. vs ADMINISTRATOR BANGALORE CITY CORPORATION,BANGALORE & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1989/72429
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HMM LIMITED & ANR.
Respondent
ADMINISTRATOR BANGALORE CITY CORPORATION,BANGALORE & ANR.
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 98(2) of the Bangalore Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, octroi duty is applicable only when goods are brought into the city for use, consumption, or sale. The Court ruled that the appellant's act of rebottling Horlicks did not constitute use within the city limits, thus entitling them to a refund of the octroi duty paid on goods exported outside the municipal limits. The Court clarified that the expression 'without breaking bulk' should be construed liberally, and the claim for refund was valid as the appellant complied with the necessary procedures under Bye-law 45 and Rules 24 to 27.

HMM LIMITED & ANR. vs ADMINISTRATOR BANGALORE CITY CORPORATION,BANGALORE & ANR. · Niyam