Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-11-28

MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71173
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
Author
L.M. SHARMA
Bench
L.M. SHARMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the classification of sheep hair as agricultural produce under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, specifically Section 2(a) and Schedule Item 4. The Court held that the term 'wool' in the Act, particularly as 'wool (0on)', is understood in the popular sense to include sheep hair, thus requiring dealers to obtain licenses and pay market fees. The interpretation aligns with the common understanding of wool and the specific inclusion of goat and camel hair in the schedule, indicating that sheep hair is indeed covered under the Act.

MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. · Niyam