SMT. ANNAPOORANI AMMAL vs G. THANGAPALAM

The Supreme Court held that under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the High Court can only interfere with findings of fact when a substantial question of law is involved. The Court found that the High Court's interference was unwarranted as it relied solely on the non-discussion of the scribe's evidence without establishing a substantial question of law. The Court upheld the lower appellate court's decision that the appellant had valid title to the property based on a registered sale deed, and the suit for specific performance was barred due to the lack of a genuine executant's right to dispose of the property.