Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-03-28

SHUBHLAXMI MILLS LIMITED vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 1975/60521
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHUBHLAXMI MILLS LIMITED
Respondent
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,GUJARAT
Author
R.S. () PATHAK
Bench
R.S. (CJ) PATHAK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33(1) and Section 34(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a reserve fund must be created in the relevant previous year to claim a development rebate. The Court clarified that the deduction cannot be allowed unless the necessary debit and credit entries are made in the profit and loss account and reserve account, respectively, in the year of installation or first use of the machinery. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with these statutory requirements.

SHUBHLAXMI MILLS LIMITED vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,GUJARAT · Niyam