P.L. SHAH vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal erred in rejecting the appellant's application for restoration of the original subsistence allowance, emphasizing that the cause of action arises monthly as the allowance is paid. The Court clarified that while relief for periods beyond three years from the Tribunal's powers cannot be granted, it can review the government's decision to reduce the allowance. The Court emphasized the need for periodic review of subsistence allowances in light of inflation and the circumstances of the suspended employee, remanding the case for merits consideration.