Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-02-14

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD. vs CHEMPHAR DRUGS & LINIMENTS, HYDERABAD.

Citation / case number
SC 1988/70906
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD.
Respondent
CHEMPHAR DRUGS & LINIMENTS, HYDERABAD.
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, a demand for excise duty can only be sustained beyond six months if it is established that the duty was not levied or paid due to fraud, collusion, or suppression of facts. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the respondent's failure to disclose certain information did not constitute sufficient grounds for extending the limitation period for duty recovery. The ruling clarified the conditions under which the five-year limitation period applies for excise duty demands.

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD. vs CHEMPHAR DRUGS & LINIMENTS, HYDERABAD. · Niyam