Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-08-01

DATTATRYA SHANKARBHAT AMBALGI & ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1992/87134
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DATTATRYA SHANKARBHAT AMBALGI & ORS.
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Author
N.D. OJHA
Bench
N.D. OJHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 10, 11, and 23 of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976, stating that these provisions do not violate Articles 14 and 31 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that the Act is included in the Ninth Schedule under Article 31-B, thus protected from judicial review. It was held that the Ceiling Act serves a public purpose by preventing land concentration and ensuring equitable distribution, and that lands reserved for public purposes under the Town Planning Act are still subject to the Ceiling Act's provisions.

DATTATRYA SHANKARBHAT AMBALGI & ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. · Niyam