Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1989

Supreme Court of India · 1989-08-08

ATUL MATHUR, DIVISIONAL SALES MANAGER OFJENSON AND NICHOLSO vs ATUL KALRA AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/70930
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ATUL MATHUR, DIVISIONAL SALES MANAGER OFJENSON AND NICHOLSO
Respondent
ATUL KALRA AND ANR.
Author
S. NATRAJAN
Bench
S. NATRAJAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the applicability of Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, concerning the prosecution of an ex-employee for refusing to vacate a company flat after resignation. The Court held that the complaint was maintainable despite the ex-employee's claims of being a licensee based on letters from the company. The Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions, finding the company to be the actual licensee and upholding the conviction of the ex-employee for non-compliance with the eviction order.

ATUL MATHUR, DIVISIONAL SALES MANAGER OFJENSON AND NICHOLSO vs ATUL KALRA AND ANR. · Niyam