Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-09-21

SUBE SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/70969
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBE SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Author
MISRA RANGNATH
Bench
MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Punjab Borstal Act, 1926, specifically Section 5, does not apply to individuals convicted under Section 302 IPC, as the definition of 'offence' under Section 2(4) excludes those punishable by death. The Court held that the maximum period of detention for adolescent convicts is seven years, and they cannot be transferred to jail solely based on age. The decision in Hava Singh v. State of Haryana was reaffirmed, clarifying that the provisions of the Borstal Act do not extend to murder convictions.

SUBE SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. · Niyam