Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-09-23

SUBHASH KUMAR LATA vs R.C. CHHIBA & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69967
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBHASH KUMAR LATA
Respondent
R.C. CHHIBA & ANR.
Author
S. NATRAJAN
Bench
S. NATRAJAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, the Rent Controller must apply his mind before granting sanction for eviction. The Court found that the landlord obtained sanction by withholding information regarding an existing tenancy, rendering the sanction vitiated by fraud and thus a nullity. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the respondents' tenancy rights were not governed by the fraudulent sanction, affirming the dismissal of the execution applications.

SUBHASH KUMAR LATA vs R.C. CHHIBA & ANR. · Niyam