Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-09-27

IKRAMUDDIN AHMED BORAH vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARRANG & OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1976/60920
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
IKRAMUDDIN AHMED BORAH
Respondent
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARRANG & OTHERS
Author
N.D. OJHA
Bench
N.D. OJHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a Sub-Inspector of Police under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India, affirming that the Superintendent of Police had the authority to dismiss the appellant as both he and the Principal Police Training College were coordinate authorities. The Court clarified that the phrase 'not reasonably practicable to hold such enquiry' does not require absolute impracticability, but rather a reasonable assessment of the situation, which in this case included the non-availability of witnesses due to fear. The dismissal was thus deemed valid and legal.

IKRAMUDDIN AHMED BORAH vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARRANG & OTHERS · Niyam