Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-10-14

MUKUND LAL & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/70982
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUKUND LAL & ANR.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Author
M.P. THAKKAR
Bench
M.P. THAKKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 172(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, which restricts the accused from calling for or seeing the case diary. The Court emphasized that this provision is part of a composite scheme ensuring that the court retains the power to examine the diary and safeguard the rights of the accused during trial. The Court found that the provision is neither unreasonable nor arbitrary, and it serves the public interest by ensuring a fair trial, thus dismissing the writ petitions filed under Article 32.

MUKUND LAL & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. · Niyam