Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-01-20

AMRIT LAL CHUM vs DEVOPRASAD DUTTA ROY AND ANR. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69954
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AMRIT LAL CHUM
Respondent
DEVOPRASAD DUTTA ROY AND ANR. ETC.
Author
A.P. SEN
Bench
A.P. SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 criminalizes the wrongful retention of company property by both current and former officers or employees after termination of employment. The Court held that the term 'officer or employee' includes those whose employment has ended, thereby overruling the Calcutta High Court's interpretation in Amrit Lal Chum v. Devi Ranjan Jha. The Court emphasized that wrongful withholding of property post-employment constitutes an offence under Section 630(1).

AMRIT LAL CHUM vs DEVOPRASAD DUTTA ROY AND ANR. ETC. · Niyam